AI and Time-Saving in Academic Writing Tasks: A Small-Scale Study of Undergraduate EFL Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/wjfh.Vol22.Iss3/Pt2.1749Keywords:
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), questionnaire, educational technologyAbstract
This study is investigating the factors influencing fourth-grade students' intention and use of (Students in university) is the goal of this study. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which suggests that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are the primary factors influencing consumers' adoption of technology, served as the theoretical foundation for the data of the study analysis. A series of statements intended to gauge the primary variables of the model reported usefulness, attitude toward usage, perceived ease of use, and actual use are Google Forms included in the questionnaire. The study concluded that the TAM model is a suitable framework for understanding and explaining the behavior of fourth-grade students towards technology, and recommends the necessity to enhance their digital learning experience.
Downloads
References
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating? Student perspectives on AI and academic integrity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103.
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740-755.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 50.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204.
Roblyer, M. D., & Hughes, J. E. (2019). Integrating educational technology into teaching (8th ed.). Pearson.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers' adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35.
Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42(1), 85-92.
UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030: Incheon declaration and framework for action for the implementation of sustainable development goal 4. UNESCO.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muna Abdul Hussein, Zahraa Adnan Mohammed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
