The Puppeteer as a Puppet: The Cynical Gaze in Julian Barnes’s Flaubert’s Parrot
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/wjfh.Vol21.Iss4.1299Keywords:
The Other, Cynicism, Puppet, enlightened, symbolic orderAbstract
When the subject fractures itself into fragments, then dissolved by the irruption of the postmodernist Real, the postmodern Oedipal subject finds itself cursed with enlightenment transforming it into an anti-Oedipal insurgent. Julian Barnes’s Flaubert’s Parrot stages this moment of transformation in a distinctly dialectical mode. Yet, this is not the entire story. Within the postmodern impulse to question paternal narratives and then subvert them, a third mode of existence emerges: the cynical one. Standing in opposition to the anti-Oedipal stance and paradoxically produced from it, this mode reconstitutes the Other after annihilating it This cynical mode/gaze unfolds itself through Braithwaite’s cynical quest to track down the French novelist, Gustave Flaubert’s stuffed parrot. This study, therefore, seeks to explore the three overlapping gazes; the pre-postmodernist, the postmodernist and the cynical on which Flaubert’s Parrot is woven. The text will be approached from a psychoanalytic/Žižekian lens, employing Slavoj Žižek’s key concepts such as “cynicism” and “false enlightened consciousness”. In this light, Flaubert’s Parrot may be read as dramatizing a Žižekian Oedipal dialectic, one that begins with traditional Oedipalism, moves through anti-Oedipalism, and culminates in a cynical re-construction.
Downloads
References
Barnes, J. (1990). Flaubert’s Parrot. New York, NY: Vintage International.
Childs, P. (2005). “Julian Barnes: “A Mixture of Genres”. Contemporary Novelists:
British Fiction since 1970. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Guignery, V. (2006). The Fiction of Julian Barnes. Houndmills Palgrave
Macmillan Press.
Hateley, Erica (2001) “Flaubert's Parrot as modernist quest”. Arts, Litteratures & Civilisations.
11. pp. 177-181.
Jawad, E. J., & Hassan, S. L. (2025). “A schizophrenic reading of Crimp's Attempts on her life.”
Wasit Journal for Human Sciences, 21(3), 1198–1224.
https://doi.org/10.31185/wjfh.Vol21.Iss3.1138
Heise, U. K. (2011). Postmodern novels. In L. Cassuto, C. V. Eby, & B. Reiss (Eds.), The
Cambridge history of the American novel (pp. 964–985). Cambridge University Press.
Lacan, J., & Fink, B. (Trans.). (2006). Écrits: The first complete edition in English. W.W. Norton
& Company.
Mahdi, AR. (2015). “The Platonic Cave Revisited: John Barth's Prison-house of
Narrativity”. EAR. 3.6. p.6035-6054.
Frank, M. (1989). What is Neo-Structuralism? University of Minnesota Press.
Nietzsche, F. (1887). On the genealogy of morals (W. Kaufmann & R. J.
Hollingdale, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage International.
Taher, IH, Abd, Kh. Q. (2023). “The Dialectic of Death in Thomas Clayton Wolfe's
Look”. Social Science Journal. 13.3. P. 3615-3622. Homeward, Angel
Vecsernyés, D. (2014). “With his watch on the inside of the wrist: Time in Julian
Barnes’s The Sense of an Ending.” In E. Tory & J. Vesztergom (Eds.), Stunned
into Uncertainty: Essays on Julian Barnes’s Fiction (pp. 29–40). Department of
English Studies.
Žižek, S. (2008). In Defense of Lost Causes. London: Verso.
—. (2012). Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical
Materialism. London: Verso.
—. (1991). Looking awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Through
Popular Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
—. (1989). The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
—. (1999). The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology.
London: Verso.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Noor Isa Abdullatif, Isra Hashim Taher

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

