The language of conspiracy in House of Cards series: A corpus-stylistic approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/wjfh.Vol21.Iss3.988Keywords:
Conspiracy, House of Cards, Corpus Stylistics, Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFLAbstract
This research explores the language of conspiracy in House of Cards through a corpus-stylistic approach, applying the transitivity model of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) to analyze the monologues of Frank Underwood. The study examines the participants, processes, and circumstances within the monologues, focusing on how language constructs power, manipulation, and control in the context of political conspiracy. By breaking down Frank's monologues into mental, material, and relational processes, the analysis uncovers the linguistic strategies he employs to manipulate others, assert dominance, and navigate the political landscape. The findings reveal that material processes dominate Frank’s speech, reflecting his action-oriented and manipulative nature. His speech consistently positions him as the central agent of control, taking decisive actions to manipulate and shape political events around him. Mental processes, though present, are secondary and primarily serve to reflect Frank’s strategic thinking, while relational processes highlight his calculated evaluations of people and relationships, defining their value based on his political objectives. These linguistic features illustrate how Frank constructs power dynamics and manipulates those around him, solidifying his role as the mastermind behind the political conspiracy. Through this corpus-stylistic lens, the research highlights how language in House of Cards constructs a web of conspiracy, with Frank’s speech as the central force driving manipulation and power. This approach contributes to a deeper understanding of how linguistic choices shape the narrative of conspiracy and power in political dramas.
Downloads
References
References
Alderson-Day, B., & Fernyhough, C. (2015). Inner speech: Development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 931–965. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000021
Boutet, M. (2015). The politics of time in House of Cards. In B. Däwes, A. Ganser, & N. Poppenhagen (Eds.), Transgressive television: Politics, crime and citizenship in 21st-century American TV series (pp. 83–102). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter. (American Studies Monograph Series).
Dishar, I. S. (2025). Critical discourse analysis of power, agency, and resistance in Malcolm X's speech The ballot or the bullet. Wasit Journal for Human Sciences, 21(1, Pt.1). https://doi.org/10.31185/wjfh.Vol21.Iss1/Pt1.868
Dyer, G. (2017). Advertising as communication (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Garil, B. A., Entong, M. B. M., Muarip, V. C., & Chavez, J. V. (2024). Language delivery styles in academic trainings: Analysis of speaker’s emotional connection to audience for lasting learning. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(3), 326–342. https://doi.org/10.30564/¬s.v6i3.6533
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
Johannesen, R. L. (1971). The emerging concept of communication as dialogue. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 57(4), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637109383082
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
Kuncewicz, D., & Kuncewicz, D. (2019). Hidden stories in monologues. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.1.3005
López Gutiérrez, M.ª L., & Flores Ivich, L. G. (2022). The concept of power and its representation in television seriality: The case of House of Cards. Communication & Society, 35(4), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.4.101-115
Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. London: SAGE Publications.
Moreno-Cely, A., Cuajera-Nahui, D., Escobar-Vasquez, C. G., et al. (2021). Breaking monologues in collaborative research: Bridging knowledge systems through a listening-based dialogue of wisdom approach. Sustainability Science, 16, 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00937-8
Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Rapin, L., Lachaux, J.-P., Baciu, M., & Lœvenbruck, H. (2014). What is that little voice inside my head? Inner speech phenomenology, its role in cognitive performance, and its relation to self-monitoring. Behavioural Brain Research, 261, 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.034
Thompson, G. (2009). The discourse of power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. London: SAGE Publications.
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 الباحث مؤيد تحسين يوسف

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

