A Socio- Stylistic Study of the Role of Social Identity in Selected Feminist Texts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/wjfh.Vol20.Iss4.745Keywords:
Socio -Stylistics , Identity , Feminist , Gender , DiscriminationAbstract
The current study explores the relationship between social identity and stylistic features in the context of contemporary feminism with reference to gender, race, and class variables. Although many studies have been conducted concerning the concept of feminist language, the relationship between social identity and linguistic features has not received enough attention, which is why the present study aims to identify the specific strategies that are used to address the goals of feminism. This research seeks to fill this gap through an analysis of twenty four contemporary Feminist texts in articles, speeches and social media posts. Employing socio-stylistic eclectic approach, the research analyses the patterns of stylistic elements in various media contexts and analyses how such elements work with the audience as well as embody different social roles. The results of the study advance the theoretical macro-socio-linguistic paradigm of socio-stylistics by identifying the link between language and social status. In addition, the study is helpful for the leaders of feminism to know how language can be utilized in a constructive manner to advance the cause of feminism.
Downloads
References
Adichie, C. N. (2014). We should all be feminists. Vintage.
Cameron, D. (1992). Feminism and linguistic theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
Chambers, J. K. (2009). Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. Wiley-Blackwell.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Eagleton, T. (2000). The idea of culture. Blackwell Publishing.
Gee, J. P. (2014). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. Routledge.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.
Hall, S. (2013). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage Publications.
Hooks, b. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. South End Press.
Labov, W. (2006). The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. Harper & Row.
Rickford, J. R. (1999). African American Vernacular English: Features, evolution, educational implications. Blackwell.
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. Routledge.
Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. Sage Publications.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. Ballantine.
Tong, R. (2009). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction. Routledge.
Zaidan, M. H., & Mohammed, H. A. (Ph.D). (2020). A socio-pragmatic study of the speech act of divorce in religious and legislative discourse. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol4.Iss41.1943
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 د. رشا طارق عواد الزبيدي

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

