Interpreting Politeness in Manuscript Rejections letters Using a Pragmatic and Stylistic Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/wjfh.Vol22.Iss4/Pt1.2208Keywords:
manuscript rejection, politeness, pragmatic and stylistic theoriesAbstract
Manuscript rejection has become a growing concern due to the increasing emphasis on publishing in highly cited journals. Many manuscripts are rejected for reasons explicitly stated or unstated by editors, journals, or reviewers. In these rejections, polite forms have been instrumental in helping editors communicate with authors. This paper surveys manuscript rejections, politeness, and academic discourse, drawing on theories, contributions, and related works. Two manuscript rejection letters were randomly chosen and analysed using Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory and Leech and Short’s stylistic approach. Analysis shows that editors have been keen to use politeness not only to mitigate the consequences of rejection but also to develop further connections with authors. Finally, the paper proposes several tips that can help authors, editors, journal reviewers, early-career researchers, and second-language researchers examine the significance, effects, and consequences of manuscript rejections, develop their publication skills, and expand their insights into future work.
Downloads
References
Abarca, E.B. & Moreno, R.G. (2006). Letters of rejection: The unwelcome news. The ESPecialist, 27(1), 21–42.
Alhamid, S. A. A. (2026). Mitigation in the Quran: A pragmatic study of prophets’ language addressing their people by the words “O My People”. Wasit Journal for Human Sciences, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.31185/wjfh.Vol22.Iss2.1232
Ali, M.J. (2021). The science and philosophy of manuscript rejection. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 69(7), 1934–1935. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1097_21
Beebe, L. Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. Scarcella, E.S. Anderson & S. Krashen (eds.), Developing communicative competence in second language (55-73). Newbury House.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Delgado, A.F., Garretson, G., & Delgado, A.F. (2019). The language of peer review reports on articles published in the BMJ, 2014–2017: An observational study. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1225-1235.
Delport, M.W. (2021). Peer reviewers’ reasons for rejecting manuscripts submitted to the Journal of the Musical Arts in Africa. Journal of the Musical Arts in Africa, 18(1), 1–13.
Fathelrahman, A.I. (2015). Rejection of good manuscripts: Possible reasons, consequences & solutions. Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9627.1000204
Hyland, H. (2016). Academic publishing & the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58-69.
Myers, D. (2020, January 11). Share our rejections. Indiana University Bloomington. https://blogs.iu.edu/sciu/2020/01/11/share-our-rejections/
Jafari, A. (2024). The role of intercultural rhetoric in acceptance or rejection of articles regarding journal selection criteria. Studies in Language, Literature, and Strategic Discourse, 2(3)150–169.
Kashiha, H. (2025). Critical comments in the disciplines: A comparative look at peer review process in applied linguistics and engineering. Text & Talk, 45(2), 227–250.
Kovner, C. (2025). Normalizing rejection. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 26(4), 231. https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544251376916
Leech, G. & M. Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Longman.
Leech, G.N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Menon, V., Varadharajan, N., Praharaj, S.K., & Ameen, S. (2022). Why do manuscripts get rejected? A content analysis of rejection reports from the Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 44(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620965845
O’Boyle, B. (2025). Careful consideration in communicating rejection: Discourse analysis of politeness, empathy, & denial in PhD rejection letters. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 10(1), 5928. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v10i1.5928
Paltridge, B. (2017). Pragmatics and reviewers’ reports. In B. Paltridge (ed.), The discourse of peer review (67–90). Palgrave Macmillan.
Sönmez, D. & Akbaş, E. (2023). Great work folks!: Establishing interpersonal communication in transparent peer reviews of research articles. Ibérica, 46, 69–95.
Teixeira da Silva, J.A., & Nazarovets, M. (2024). Rejected papers in academic publishing: Turning negatives into positives to maximize paper acceptance. Learned Publishing, 38(2)155-170.
The BMJ. (2020). First decision letter. The British Medical Journal. https://www.bmj.com/sites/default/files/attachments/bmj-article/pre-pub-history/first_decision_26.3.20_0.pdf
Wangia, J.I., & Otonde, L.A. (2020). Politeness in teacher-student interactions in a Kenyan secondary school context & implications for pedagogy in communication skills. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 10(2), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2020.102007
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, G., Wang, L., Xie, W., Shang, F., Xia, X., Jiang, C. & Wang, X. (2021). This article is interesting, however…: Exploring the language use in the peer review comment of articles published in the BMJ. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 74, 399–416.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sarah Hashim Muhsin1 Asst. Prof. Mohammed Nasser Abdulsada2
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
