The Beast Within: Animality, Power, and the Human Condition in Animal Farm"

Authors

  • Asst. Lect. Osamah Abdullah Ahed Ministry of Education Iraq Thi Qar Education Office Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/wjfh.Vol21.Iss4.1236

Keywords:

The Beast Within: Animality, Authority and the Human Condition in Animal Farm

Abstract

This study conceptualizes the Animal Farm of George Orwell in metaphorical terms as a great allegory that discusses the relation between animality, and human experience. According to this study, George Orwell uses his animal characters for nothing more than satire; he applies them in a symbolic structure to test how evil can be naturally inherent in human nature plus potentialities of political structures to become perverted. In his novella, Orwell describes an uprising led by animals against human tyranny very ironically falling into the same despotism it meant to overthrow; indeed, eventually more than equally oppressive. He critically analyzes how Napoleon assumes Stalin's dictatorship and Squealer assumes official propaganda whose real function lay in twisting the truth all together with Orwell proving that despotism does survive through characters like Boxer blindly loyal horse and donkey Benjamin all other social strata contributing through fear, indifference or fear.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References

- Albloly, A. M., & Nour, H. S. M. (2019). The Portrayal of Political Symbolism in George Orwell Writings: With Reference to Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four.

- Ali, S. H. (2021). The Role of Propaganda in George Orwell's Animal Farm. Alustath, 60(2).‏

- BERNARD, Crick. George Orwell: A Life. London: Secker & Warburg, 1980.‏

- Bloom, Harold, editor. George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Chelsea House Publishers, 2009.

- Clarke, B. (2006). Orwell and Englishness. The Review of English Studies, 57(228), 83-105.‏

- Eagleton, T. (2011). Literary theory: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons.‏

- From Freedom, E., & Horney, K. (1941). Erich Fromm. Farrar & Rinehart, 142.‏

- Gleason, A. (2006). Stalin: A Biography. By Robert Service. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004.

- Graham, L. R. (1992). Science, philosophy, and human behavior in the Soviet Union. Studies in Soviet Thought, 44(2).

- Jalal, A., & Rasool, S. H. (2023). Politics of Language in George Orwell’s Animal Farm. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 7(I), 95-103.‏

- Mohammad, M. J. (2024). The Allegorical Imagery in George Orwell’s “Animal Farm.”. Ministry of Higher Education.‏

- Rodden, J. (2003). Understanding" Animal Farm": A Student Casebook to Issues, Sources, and Historical Documents.

- Rodden, J. (2016). Between Self and Society: Inner Worlds and Outer Limits in the British Psychological Novel. University of Texas Press.‏

- SHELDON, S. W. (2012). Politics and vision: continuity and innovation in western political thought. LITERARY LICENSING, LLC.‏

- Taylor, D. J. (2023). Orwell: The New Life.

- Tucker, Robert C. The Marx-Engels Reader. W.W. Norton & Company, 1978.

- Wolfenstein, E. V. (1996). Psychoanalysis in political theory.‏

- Xie, T. A. (2020, December). An Analysis of Political Allegory in Animal Farm: from the Perspective of Animal Metaphor. In 2020 3rd International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2020) (pp. 219-224). Atlantis Press.‏

- Zimbardo, P. (2007). The lucifer effect-Understanding how good people turn evil.‏

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

Issue

Section

European languages and literature

How to Cite

Ahed, O. A. (2025). The Beast Within: Animality, Power, and the Human Condition in Animal Farm". Wasit Journal for Human Sciences, 21(4), 1291-1280. https://doi.org/10.31185/wjfh.Vol21.Iss4.1236