Mapping Rhetorical Appeals onto Discourse Tools: An Integrated Analysis of English and Arabic Popular Fictional Stories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/wjfh.Vol21.Iss1/Pt1.886Keywords:
Ethos, Pathos, Logos, Rhetoric, Discourse Tools Analysis, Popular Fiction, Emotional Vulnerability.Abstract
Popular fiction is a mass-market genre with a commercial focus that focuses on re-contextualised relationships, love, pride, prejudice, and profound meanings to probe for human experiences reflected through characters and their small gestures. The current study investigates ten extracts taken from two collections of popular fictions; 'The Darcy Monologues' edited by Boyd and (اشياء صغيرة/ The Little Things) written by Samira Azzam. Using Aristotelian appeals (ethos, pathos, logos) and Gee’s (2017) discourse tools, the research explores emotional vulnerability and societal expectations portrayed in each text. Thus, the key questions of the study are: How do popular stories represent diverse cultural identities and ideologies? How can dramatic monologues and relatable human feelings and experiences, especially when viewed through the prism of cultural identities and ideologies, reflect and question power dynamics? How do the selected texts employ Aristotelian appeals to convey their messages? How do the primary tools of Paul Gee's discourse analysis model and Aristotelian appeals reveal the construction of personal narrative and social commentary in the selected stories? The study concludes that analyzing texts from different linguistic and cultural contents enriches the readers’ understanding of universal human experiences, particularly love, self-perception, and societal pressures. This study also demonstrates the value of integrating discourse analysis tools with rhetorical appeals in linguistic and literary studies.
Downloads
References
References
Ataei, S. (2018). Exploring the emotional language in the Twilight novel as a literary discourse: An appraisal theory analysis. Purdue University Purdue E-Pubs, 11, 30.
Barnes, C. (1995). Disability rights: Rhetoric and reality in the UK. Disability & Society, 10(1), 111–116.
Bennett, T. (Ed.). (2023). Popular fiction: Technology, ideology, production, reading. Taylor & Francis.
Boyd, C. (Ed.). (2017). The Darcy monologues. The Quill Ink.
Brummett, B. (2000). Reading rhetorical theory. (No Title).
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business research methods. Oxford University Press.
Cyphert, D. (2010). The rhetorical analysis of business speech: Unresolved questions. Journal of Business Communication, 47, 346–368.
Dolby, S. K. (2008). Self-help books. University of Illinois Press Urbana and Chicago.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. OUP Oxford. Retrieved from Google Books.
Gee, J. P. (2011). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. Routledge.
Gelder, K. (2004). Popular fiction: The logics and practices of a literary field. Routledge.
Green, S. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29, 653–669.
Hameed, S. H., & Alhusseini, H. A. M. (2024). Analysis of the representation of identity in the British novel Blonde Roots: A critical discourse. Lark Journal, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.Vol1.Iss52.3324
Higgins, C., & Walker, R. (2012, September). Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports. Accounting Forum, 36(3), 194–208.
Jackson, B. (2007). When rhetoric sells out: What to make of Jay Heinrich's Thank you for arguing.
Kennedy, G. A. (Trans.). (2007). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. Oxford University Press.
Lindquist, K. A., MacCormack, J. K., & Shablack, H. (2015). The role of language in emotion: Predictions from psychological constructionism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00444
Mahmoudi, D., & Meghezli, L. (2022). A rhetorical discourse analysis of two motivational speeches case study: Brendon Burchard’s speeches “How to Succeed” and “How to Stay Focused” (Doctoral dissertation, Mouloud Mammeri University of Tizi–Ouzou).
McEnery, T. (2006). Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
Piselli, K. (1988). Samira Azzam: Author's works and vision. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 20(1), 93–108.
The Darcy Monologues. (2015, January 11). Retrieved from https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/34188549-the-darcy-monologues
عزام، سميرة (1954). اشياء صغيرة: قصص. دار العلم للملايين.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 أ.م.د. رائد داخل كريم
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
